Skip to content
Work Practice Products Coding interviews Machine learning coding Quant developer HFT course Blog Method Why me About Book a call

Work · A

Quant interview coaching and MFE admissions

One-to-one coaching from a working high-frequency trading quant, for STEM students, PhDs and early-career engineers targeting research, trading or development roles, and for applicants to MFE and MFin programmes. One hour online, £250, with your CV read first.

Practice: 1040 questions with worked solutions, including 500 quant interview questions and a timed quiz, plus coding interview practice with an editor that runs your code in six languages.


PDF · Edition 2 · £79

The Quant Careers Report

Before you apply: what 13 trading firms state they pay, the graduation dates each programme accepts, and how each one interviews, from their own adverts and careers pages.

Buy the report — £79 See what is inside


What actually gets tested

Most candidates grind brainteaser lists and arrive at a final round assuming the test is whether they can produce the answer. What the desk is watching is how you behave in the ninety seconds after you realise you cannot.

I have sat on the receiving end of these interviews, and I have done the job they select for. The preparation is built around what the desk is actually screening:


Where the depth comes from

Published academic work

My research sits at the intersection of probability theory and pure mathematics, and of both with markets. Two strands: high-frequency trading, and proving correctness of algorithms — graph algorithms and greedy algorithms — using category theory. Alongside it, algebraic topology, differential geometry and stochastic analysis.

This is not decoration on a tutoring profile. It is why I can take a client to the bottom of a measure-theoretic argument or a STEP question rather than to the edge of what I remember.


The mathematics, plainly

Candidates ask what depth is actually required. This is roughly it. If these read as familiar, the preparation is about performance rather than content. If they do not, that is the gap we close first.

Itô's lemma — why the second-order term survives
df= ( ∂f∂t +μ ∂f∂x +12σ2 ∂2f ∂x2 )dt +σ ∂f∂x dWt

Ordinary calculus loses the third term. Quadratic variation does not vanish, and being able to say why in one sentence is the actual test.

Change of measure — Girsanov, and why anyone bothers
dℚdℙ = exp( −∫0T θsdWs −12 ∫0T θs2ds )

Pricing is an expectation under a measure chosen to make a process a martingale. That is a convenience, not a claim about the world.

Optional stopping — the shape behind a surprising number of brainteasers
𝔼[Xτ] =𝔼[X0] for a bounded stopping timeτ

Gambler's ruin, random walks on graphs, expected time to absorption. Once you see the shape you stop solving these from scratch.

Conditional expectation — the tower property
𝔼[𝔼[X∣𝒢] ∣ℋ]= 𝔼[X∣ℋ] for ℋ⊆𝒢

More interview probability reduces to conditioning correctly than to any other single idea. Most candidates are comfortable with it right up until it is the whole question.

Beyond this: Lévy processes, rough paths, the measure-theoretic underpinnings in depth. Enjoyable, and almost never asked. Preparing on that material is a way of doing something pleasant and calling it work.


How I can help

Further reading: what a quant interview is actually testing and quant interview questions with worked solutions; trader, researcher or developer, what firms pay interns, and an eight-week study plan.

Firm by firm: Jane Street, Optiver, Citadel, IMC, Five Rings, Two Sigma, D. E. Shaw, DRW, Hudson River Trading, SIG, G-Research and Flow Traders, each from what the firm itself publishes about its process.

Book a free 20-minute call


Book the strategy hour — £250 What the hour covers →

Read next